Geopolitical Forecasting & Crisis Intelligence

A new approach to forecasting in geopolitics and crisis

We combine decades of crisis intelligence experience with advanced analytical methods to produce scored, testable predictions for governments, institutions, and businesses.

We have developed a new forecasting model, now in its testing phase, and we would like to share our work with you and get your feedback. The results so far have been striking — and we are reporting them honestly, including where the model has been wrong.

Active Monitoring
Updated 24 March 2026
Live Conflict
Iran
Five-day pause · Bond market broke him
↓↓↓↓↓ Fifth consecutive decline · Score 90 · Exit forming
Highest Scoring
Cuba
5.8M earthquake compounds crisis
↑ No oil for 3 months · Quake + protests + blackouts · Displacement active
Largely Resolved
Panama
Resolved quietly
✓ Resistance collapsed · Trophy delivered
Slow Burn
NATO
Hollowing out
→ Bilateral deals · 3–5% GDP demands
Rufus Street Intelligence · Daily Briefing

Iran Day 24: The Bond Market Broke Him. Again.

Trajectory
MODERATE
↓ 90
Fifth consecutive decline from 202
Motivation
PEAK
▸ holds at 9
Opportunity
PEAK
▸ saturated at 10
Capability
FRAGILE
▸ holds at 9 — pause IS the trophy forming
Friction
MAXIMUM
↑ 9 — bond market is the decisive channel

What Changed Since Day 18

Decisive The bond market broke. Three consecutive weeks of losses. The 10-year Treasury yield hit 4.39% — highest since July. UK Gilts surged above 4.9% — highest since 2008. Markets stripped out all rate cuts for 2026 and began pricing rate hikes. Stocks, bonds, and gold all sold off simultaneously — the trifecta that signals systemic stress, not sector rotation. Gold had its worst week since 1983. This is the Liberation Day mechanism reproduced exactly. On Liberation Day: four days of stock market crashes produced nothing. One afternoon of bond market stress produced the 90-day tariff pause within hours. On Iran: three weeks of oil above $100, casualties, base fracture, allied refusal, internal resignations — none of it produced a policy change. Then bond yields hit multi-month highs and Trump announced a five-day pause.
Key Trump announced a five-day pause in strikes on Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure, citing “very good and productive conversations” with Tehran. He claimed 15 points of agreement. Witkoff and Kushner are reportedly involved. Oil crashed 7% — Brent fell from $114 to below $99 in hours. Bond yields dropped. Asian markets rallied. This is exit construction: a time-limited, face-saving de-escalation that lets him claim he is negotiating from strength while the actual pressure is economic.
Denied Iran immediately denied any talks had taken place. Fars news agency: “no negotiations or discussions with the United States since the war began.” Tehran said Trump’s move was designed to lower energy prices and “buy time” for military plans. This is a significant complication: if Iran will not confirm talks, the trophy — a deal — cannot be constructed bilaterally. But the pattern from Liberation Day holds: Trump declared the tariff pause unilaterally too. He does not need the other side to agree to his framing.
Fed The Fed held rates at 3.50–3.75% on 18 March and raised inflation projections. Powell: “too soon to know” the impact of the war. The dot plot projected one cut in 2026 — but the market is now pricing zero cuts and potential hikes. The Fed acknowledged the war’s uncertainty in its statement. Growth forecast cut to 0.9% for 2026. The war is now a macroeconomic event, not just a military one.
Escalation Before the pause, the war intensified dramatically. Trump threatened to “obliterate” Iran’s power plants unless Hormuz reopened within 48 hours. Iran attacked Dimona (near Israel’s nuclear facility) — 180 injured. CBS reported “heavy preparations” for ground troops. Brent hit $114. IEA: the crisis is “worse than the 1970s oil shocks combined.” Over 2,000 people have been killed across the region. The UAE has intercepted 352 ballistic missiles, 15 cruise missiles, and 1,789 drones since the war began.
Model read The bond market is the constant. Liberation Day: oil→bonds→90-day tariff pause. Iran: oil→bonds→five-day strike pause. Same president. Same mechanism. Same face-saving, time-limited framework. The cost that moves this president is not the loudest one — it is the one he cannot dismiss, delegate, or reframe. Casualties did not do it. Base fracture did not do it. Allied refusal did not do it. Congressional opposition did not do it. The bond market did it. Again. We wrote this in Edition 3 (“It’s Yesterday Once More”) and it has been confirmed within a week of publication. Score 90 — fifth consecutive decline. Direction of travel is unambiguous. Form of exit remains uncertain.

The Playbook — Where Are We in the Cycle?

Dominance
PAUSED
5-day halt on power plant strikes
Cost Signals
DECISIVE
Bond market → pause. Liberation Day confirmed.
Exit Construction
ACTIVE
“15 points of agreement” · Iran denies
Dominance: The targeted killing programme and airstrikes continue, but the power plant ultimatum has been paused. Over 9,000 targets struck. Iran’s military capacity is severely degraded but its ability to retaliate — missiles on Israel, drones across the Gulf — remains intact. Netanyahu continues striking independently. The dominance narrative is strong but the “obliterate” threat was followed by a pause, not action.
Cost signals: This is where the week was decisive. The bond market broke the pattern that oil, casualties, base dissent, and allied refusal could not. Three straight weeks of bond losses, 10-year yield at highest since July, markets pricing rate hikes instead of cuts, and gold at its worst week in four decades. The Liberation Day mechanism is now confirmed across two different crises: when oil-driven inflation pushes bond yields to levels that threaten mortgages, borrowing, and the broader economy, Trump moves. The bond market is the transmission mechanism. Oil is the input.
Exit construction: The five-day pause is the clearest exit construction signal since the war began. Trump claims 15 points of agreement and productive talks. Iran denies all of it. The trophy is being constructed unilaterally, just as the tariff pause was. Whether Iran cooperates with the framing is secondary — on Liberation Day, China did not agree to Trump’s terms either. The question is whether the pause holds, extends, or collapses when the five days expire.
Watch: Cuba Every day the Iran war costs more, Cuba becomes more attractive. 5.8M earthquake on top of three-month oil drought, 20-hour blackouts, spreading protests. If the five-day pause leads to exit, watch for immediate Cuba acceleration — exactly as Liberation Day’s tariff pause freed bandwidth for Venezuela. Score unchanged at 216.

What Happens in the Five Days?

The pause expires on or around 28 March. The key question is not whether talks are real — Iran says they are not — but whether the economic pressure that produced the pause continues to force the direction of travel toward de-escalation.

Three scenarios for the five-day window: (1) The pause extends or converts into a ceasefire framework — Trump claims victory, oil falls further, bonds stabilise. This is the Liberation Day pattern completing. (2) The pause holds but collapses on Day 5 — strikes resume, oil spikes, bonds sell off again, and the cycle repeats at higher cost. (3) Israel acts independently during the pause — a major strike undermines the framework before it can solidify. The Netanyahu divergence remains the structural wild card.

Our assessment: the structural conditions for de-escalation are now overwhelming. The score has fallen from 202 to 90 in five consecutive assessments. The bond market mechanism has fired. The exit construction is active. But the form of exit — deal, ceasefire, unilateral declaration of victory — remains genuinely uncertain. We are logging this as “too early to call” and watching.

So What — Implications for Decision-Makers

Governments & Diplomats
The five-day window is the best opportunity for diplomatic intervention since the war began. But Iran denies talks are happening. Any framework must account for the possibility that Trump is constructing the exit unilaterally. The Oman channel and Ghalibaf (Iranian parliament speaker) are reported as potential intermediaries. Starmer has called an emergency meeting. Von der Leyen says it is time to negotiate. The window is narrow.
Businesses & Supply Chains
Oil dropped 7% on the pause announcement — Brent below $99 after hitting $114 the same morning. But the Strait of Hormuz remains closed. No physical supply has changed. The price drop is sentiment, not fundamentals. If the pause collapses, oil returns to $110+ within hours. Plan for continued volatility. The IEA says this is worse than both 1970s shocks combined.
Security & Defence Planners
Strikes continue despite the pause — only power plant targeting is deferred. Israel is still hitting Tehran. Iran is still launching missiles at Israel, the Gulf, and US assets. 2,000+ killed. Ground troop preparations reported. The five-day pause is a political signal, not a military ceasefire. The conflict perimeter has not contracted.

Key Signals This Week

Pause expiry ~28 March Oil price trajectory during pause Bond yield reaction Iran: any acknowledgment of talks Israel: independent strikes during pause Trump language ratio (deal vs dominance) Ground troop developments Cuba: displacement acceleration

About this analysis. The bond market thesis was published in Edition 3 (“It’s Yesterday Once More”) on 18 March and confirmed within five days. Full methodology available under NDA. intel.rufusstreet.com

How to read this. Our model tracks four variables for each scenario: motivation (how personally driven is the decision-maker), opportunity (how much media and political space exists for action), capability (how deliverable is the desired outcome), and friction (what institutional, political, and economic forces push back). When the first three are high and friction is low, action is very likely. We update daily as new inputs arrive.
Published assessments
We publish our predictions before events unfold and report the results honestly — including where the model is wrong.
Edition 3 · March 2026 · NEW
It’s Yesterday Once More
Just like 1973, the world economy is being tossed around by the daily price of a barrel of oil. But this time it moves to the tune of just one man. We mapped the president’s language, our composite score, and the oil price — and found a gap between what markets price and what actually drives the decisions.
Read the full analysis →
Edition 2 · March 2026
The Art (and the Science) of the Prediction — Edition 2
A week ago, we asked the right question at the right time. Would Trump make a deal with Iran or strike? What lessons have we learned about the art and science of forecasting?
Read the full analysis →
Edition 1 · February 2026
The Art of the Prediction
Nobody can predict what Trump will do next. That’s the consensus. We think it’s wrong. We built a model, tested it against every major crisis — and it works.
Read the full analysis →
Tested against every major crisis of Trump’s second term
The model identified the correct trajectory in every case — including which signals would influence the president’s decisions and which wouldn’t.
February 2026 · Post-Mortem
Iran: Operation Epic Fury
We predicted a 70% probability of a deal. The strikes came instead. Almost nobody called this — Polymarket had strike probability at 23% as of February 9. Our post-mortem found the model’s framework was sound: when we corrected a single input, the strike overtook the deal as the highest-scoring pathway. We got the question right, the drivers right, and the signals right. What we got wrong was the form.
Framework validated Single input miscalibrated Three structural learnings identified
April 2025
Liberation Day Tariffs
The consensus expected the stock market crash to force reversal. It didn’t. The model identified a different trigger entirely. When that trigger fired, the 90-day pause followed within hours.
Direction correct · Mechanism correct · Timing: area for improvement
January 2026
Venezuela
The model predicted no retreat. Congressional concern, international condemnation, and great power protests were all present — and all irrelevant. The model identified which signals mattered before the operation concluded.
Direction correct · Faster than predicted
January 2026
Greenland
The model predicted escalation followed by retreat to a face-saving framework. Eight nations issued a joint statement — nothing changed. One person sat across a table and offered a deal.
Direction correct · Mechanism correct
January 2026
Minneapolis
Two civilians killed during federal enforcement. The first did not trigger de-escalation. The second did. The model’s framework explains why similar events produced different responses.
Framework validated · Timing sequence identified
What the model says happens next
Live, timestamped assessments. We report the results honestly — including where the model is wrong.
Live Conflict
Iran
Bond market is the constant · Five-day pause active
Day 24 of Operation Epic Fury. The bond market broke the pattern. Three consecutive weeks of losses, 10-year yield at highest since July, markets pricing rate hikes, gold worst week since 1983 — and Trump announced a five-day pause on power plant strikes citing “productive conversations.” Iran denies any talks. This is the Liberation Day mechanism confirmed: when oil-driven inflation pushes bond yields to levels threatening mortgages and the broader economy, Trump moves. Same president, same transmission mechanism, same face-saving time-limited framework. Score 90 — fifth consecutive decline from 202 at peak. R=9, highest of any episode. Direction of travel is unambiguous. The structural conditions for de-escalation are overwhelming. The form of exit — deal, ceasefire, or unilateral declaration — remains genuinely uncertain. Pause expires ~28 March.
Watch signals: Pause expiry ~28 March · Oil trajectory during pause · Bond yield reaction · Iran acknowledgment of talks · Israel independent strikes · Trump language ratio · Ground troop developments
Forward Assessment
Cuba
Highest scoring · Displacement accelerating
Highest-scoring scenario we are tracking. A 5.8-magnitude earthquake struck Cuba on 17 March, adding natural disaster to a man-made crisis: no oil for three months, 20-hour blackouts, protests spreading, a Communist Party office torched in Moron. Diaz-Canel has confirmed talks with the US. 51 political prisoners released via Vatican mediation. Trump: “friendly takeover, or we’ll do it just as easy.” The displacement pattern from Iran is now active — as Iran costs mount, Cuba offers a lower-friction compensating trophy. Score unchanged at 216 pending Iran resolution, but every condition is strengthening and the earthquake adds humanitarian pressure that may accelerate the timeline.
Key factors: Protests spreading · Rubio as Secretary of State actively “dealing” · No oil for three months · Vatican-mediated prisoner release · Displacement from Iran costs · Form and timing, not whether
Largely Resolved
Panama
Resolved quietly
Played out as the model predicted. Resistance collapsed early. Panama’s Supreme Court voided Chinese-linked port contracts. The trophy is being delivered without confrontation. This is what it looks like when nobody pushes back.
Outcome: Direction correct · Mechanism correct · Resistance collapse predicted
Slow Burn
NATO
Hollowing out
Formal withdrawal scores low (genuine Congressional barriers). But hollowing-out through conditional Article 5 interpretations, bilateral deals, and reduced force presence scores much higher. Watch the 3–5% GDP defence spending demands.
Key factors: Bilateral defence deals · Conditional security language · US force reductions · Greenland dynamics
Experience meets innovation
A joint project between Rufus Street Consulting and Harquebus Intelligence & Security — combining decades of crisis communications and intelligence experience with advanced analytical methods.
Rufus Street Consulting
Geoff Beattie
Founder
Strategic communications executive, crisis advisor, and agency leader with over 30 years’ experience advising corporations and governments through geopolitical crises. Geoff has worked at the intersection of politics, media, and business across Europe, the Middle East, and the Americas.

This project grew from a simple frustration: the people Geoff advises — governments, boards, risk teams — were permanently reactive to a president who defies conventional analysis. They needed better tools.
Harquebus Intelligence & Security
Paul Easter
Founder
An intelligence officer with 30 years of military, government and commercial intelligence and crisis management experience, from the Cabinet Office to the C-Suite. Paul has enabled Generals, government ministers and high net worth individuals to make the right decisions in highly complex and conflicted environments.

Together with Geoff, and backed by an agile and continuously improving AI toolset, they deliver auditable analysis and advice to guide your risk and crisis management decisions in the most demanding scenarios.

A new kind of analysis

Our approach combines human expert judgment with advanced analytical methods in a structured, repeatable process. The human contribution provides the contextual knowledge, mechanism explanations, and interpretive judgment that no machine can replicate. The analytical component provides pattern recognition at scale, consistency, and the discipline to reject variables that don’t hold. The result is scored, testable, falsifiable intelligence — not opinion. We document our predictions before events unfold and check them against outcomes.

Start a Conversation

The most important conversations happen before the crisis.

If you would like to receive our analysis as events develop, or to discuss how this approach might apply to your specific risk exposure, we would like to hear from you.

We respond to every enquiry personally.